Cafe Roubaix

Despre ciclismul de azi şi cel de altădată

Ierarhiile World Tour după Turul Franţei

Clasamentul individual:

1 – Alberto Contador – 407 puncte

2 – Vincenzo Nibali – 392 de puncte

3 – Alejandro Valverde – 382 de puncte

4 – Nairo Quintana – 345 de puncte

5 – Jean-Christoph Peraud – 300 de puncte

6 – Fabian Cancellara – 274 de puncte

7 – Simon Gerrans – 268 de puncte

8 – Rui Costa – 268 de puncte

9 – Peter Sagan – 257 de puncte

10 – Michal Kwiatkowski – 257 de puncte

Clasamentul pe echipe:

1 – Movistar – 901 puncte

2 – AG2R – 860 de puncte

3 – Omega Pharma-Quick Step – 842 de puncte

4 – Tinkoff-Saxo – 741 de puncte

5 – BMC – 649 de puncte

6 – Astana – 644 de puncte

7 – Katusha – 622 de puncte

8 – Belkin – 622 de puncte

9 – Trek Factory Racing – 534 de puncte

10 – Sky – 488 de puncte

Clasamentul pe naţiuni:

1 – Spania – 1035 de puncte

2 – Italia – 898 de puncte

3 – Franţa – 895 de puncte

4 – Columbia – 695 de puncte

5 – Olanda – 681 de puncte

6 – Australia – 642 de puncte

7 – Belgia – 597 de puncte

8 – Germania – 520 de puncte

9 – Marea Britanie – 485 de puncte

10 – Polonia – 386 de puncte

Single Post Navigation

2 thoughts on “Ierarhiile World Tour după Turul Franţei

  1. cnicholl33 on said:

    Thanks for these.

    I was thinking, why aren’t the riders standings run more like the ATP tennis tour or world golf rankings doing a running total over 12 to 24 months, while keeping the teams standings as they are.

  2. I don’t know how it is on golf, I just know about the tennis ranking and I don’t think it will fit cycling. First of all tennis is an individual sport, while cycling is considered a team one. I don’t even agree with having individual rankings in cycling. Almost all the time they are not reflecting the reality.
    Who’s the best? Nibali as it is going for the GC or Sagan that he is always in Top 10 or Kittel as he is good at sprints?
    Remember that if the yellow jersey was accorded on some points criteria (like it was accorded I think at some editions in the ’20s) Sagan would have won the Tour de France.

    More than this sometimes is not a fair sportive race and it is decided by the interest of the team. Remember Tour 2012 where Froome might had a chance in front of Wiggins if he was in another team, but Sky’s strategy kept him near Wiggins on the mountains.

    So, in conclusion I don’t know exactly what would be the right type of ranking. It’s just that are a lot of cons for all the options and not so many pros. It’s good that not too much fans give so big importance to this World Tour rankings.

Lasă un răspuns

Completează mai jos detaliile tale sau dă clic pe un icon pentru a te autentifica:

Logo WordPress.com

Comentezi folosind contul tău WordPress.com. Dezautentificare / Schimbă )

Poză Twitter

Comentezi folosind contul tău Twitter. Dezautentificare / Schimbă )

Fotografie Facebook

Comentezi folosind contul tău Facebook. Dezautentificare / Schimbă )

Fotografie Google+

Comentezi folosind contul tău Google+. Dezautentificare / Schimbă )

Conectare la %s

%d blogeri au apreciat asta: